000			03073nam a2200385 i 4500
001			CR9781009026659
003			UkCbUP
005			20240301142640.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr||||||||||||
008			201127s2022||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020			_a9781009026659 (ebook)
020			_z9781316515808 (hardback)
020			_z9781009013024 (paperback)
040			_aUkCbUP _beng _erda _cUkCbUP
050	0	0	_aK3585 _b.P48 2022
082	0	0	_a344.04/633 _223/eng/20220831
100	1		_aPetersmann, Marie-Catherine, _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aWhen environmental protection and human rights collide : _bthe politics of conflict management by regional courts / _cMarie-Catherine Petersmann.
264		1	_aCambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _c2022.
300			_a1 online resource (xvi, 288 pages) : _bdigital, PDF file(s).
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aCambridge studies in international and comparative law ; _v172
500			_aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 20 Oct 2022).
505	0		_aIntroduction -- Narratives of environmental and human rights protection - from a 'pristine wilderness' to a 'human environment' -- Horizons of synergy - adjudicating environmental and human rights protection -- Constructing and contesting anthropocentric synergies -- Countering the dominant frame - an account of trade-offs and tensions -- The general interest as universalisation strategy -- Expert knowledge as universalisation strategy -- Conclusion.
520			_aConflicts between environmental protection laws and human rights present delicate trade-offs when concerns for social and ecological justice are increasingly intertwined. This book retraces how the legal ordering of environmental protection evolved over time and progressively merged with human rights concerns, thereby leading to a synergistic framing of their relation. It explores the world-making effects this framing performed by establishing how 'humans' ought to relate to 'nature', and examines the role played by legislators, experts and adjudicators in (re)producing it. While it questions, contextualises and problematises how and why this dominant framing was construed, it also reveals how the conflicts that underpin this relationship - and the victims they affect - mainly remained unseen. The analysis critically evaluates the argumentative tropes and adjudicative strategies used in the environmental case-law of regional courts to understand how these conflicts are judicially mediated, thereby opening space for new modes of politics, legal imagination and representation.
650		0	_aEnvironmental law, International.
650		0	_aHuman rights.
650		0	_aInternational human rights courts.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _z9781316515808
830		0	_aCambridge studies in international and comparative law (Cambridge, England : 1996) ; _v172.
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009026659
999			_c9966 _d9966