000			02881nam a2200397 i 4500
001			CR9781316480106
003			UkCbUP
005			20240905185653.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr||||||||||||
008			150602s2021||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020			_a9781316480106 (ebook)
020			_z9781107136762 (hardback)
020			_z9781316501986 (paperback)
040			_aUkCbUP _beng _erda _cUkCbUP
050	0	0	_aK840 _b.G47 2021
082	0	0	_a346.02/2 _223
100	1		_aGerhart, Peter M., _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aContract law and social morality / _cPeter M. Gerhart, Case Western Reserve University.
264		1	_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2021.
300			_a1 online resource (xiv, 217 pages) : _bdigital, PDF file(s).
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
500			_aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 08 Feb 2021).
505	0		_aIntroduction : understanding implied obligations : reasoning and methodology -- Individuals and relationships -- Authority's limits -- Promises and obligations -- Maximization and cooperation -- The foundations of value-balancing legal reasoning -- The scope of obligations -- The source of obligations -- Relationality redux : law on the ground and law on the books -- Legal enforceability : formation -- Performance obligations : methodological issues -- Performance obligations : the values-balancing approach -- Consumer contracts and standard terms -- Excused performance and risk allocation -- Remedies.
520			_aWhen people in a relationship disagree about their obligations to each other, they need to rely on a method of reasoning that allows the relationship to flourish while advancing each person's private projects. This book presents a method of reasoning that reflects how people reason through disagreements and how courts create doctrine by reasoning about the obligations arising from the relationship. Built on the ideal of the other-regarding person, Contract Law and Social Morality displays a method of reasoning that allows one person to integrate their personal interests with the interests of another, determining how divergent interests can be balanced against each other. Called values-balancing reasoning, this methodology makes transparent the values at stake in a disagreement, and provides a neutral and objective way to identify and evaluate the trade-offs that are required if the relationship is to be sustained or terminated justly.
650		0	_aContracts.
650		0	_aObligations (Law)
650		0	_aContracts _xSocial aspects.
650		0	_aContracts _xMoral and ethical aspects.
650		0	_aStandardized terms of contract.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _z9781107136762
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480106
942			_2ddc _cEB
999			_c9637 _d9637