000			02160nam a2200397 i 4500
001			CR9781108890922
003			UkCbUP
005			20240909180406.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr||||||||||||
008			191106s2022||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020			_a9781108890922 (ebook)
020			_z9781108835534 (hardback)
020			_z9781108812870 (paperback)
040			_aUkCbUP _beng _erda _cUkCbUP
043			_an-us---
050		4	_aKF560 _b.F46 2022
082	0	4	_a346.7304 _223
245	0	0	_aFeminist judgments : _brewritten property opinions / _cedited by Eloisa C. Rodriguez-Dod, Elena Maria Marty-Nelson.
264		1	_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2022.
300			_a1 online resource (xxiii, 419 pages) : _bdigital, PDF file(s).
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aFeminist judgments series
500			_aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 22 Oct 2021).
520			_aHow could feminist perspectives and methods change the shape of property law? This volume assembles a group of diverse scholars to explore this question by presenting fundamental property law cases rewritten from a feminist perspective. The cases cover a broad range of property law topics, from landlord-tenant rights and obligations, patents, and zoning to publicity rights, land titles, concurrent ownership, and takings. These rewritten opinions and their accompanying commentaries demonstrate how incorporating feminist theories and methods could have made property law more just and equitable for women and marginalized groups. The book also shows how property law is not neutral but is shaped by the society that produces it and the judges who apply it.
650		0	_aProperty _zUnited States _vCases.
650		0	_aFeminist jurisprudence _zUnited States.
700	1		_aRodriguez-Dod, Eloisa, _d1959- _eeditor.
700	1		_aMarty-Nelson, Elena, _eeditor.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _z9781108835534
830		0	_aFeminist judgments series.
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108890922
942			_2ddc _cEB
999			_c9529 _d9529