000 02280nam a2200373 i 4500
001 CR9781009039321
003 UkCbUP
005 20240913180901.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 210113s2022||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020 _a9781009039321 (ebook)
020 _z9781316510667 (hardback)
020 _z9781009017725 (paperback)
040 _aUkCbUP
_beng
_erda
_cUkCbUP
043 _ae-uk---
050 4 _aKD4902
_b.A55 2022
082 0 4 _a347.41012
_223
100 1 _aAllen, Jason Grant,
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aNon-statutory executive powers and judicial review /
_cJason Grant Allen.
264 1 _aCambridge :
_bCambridge University Press,
_c2022.
300 _a1 online resource (xix, 333 pages) :
_bdigital, PDF file(s).
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
490 1 _aCambridge studies in constitutional law
500 _aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 18 Aug 2022).
520 _aThat non-statutory executive powers are subject to judicial review is beyond doubt. But current judicial practice challenges prevailing theories of judicial review and raises a host of questions about the nature of official power and action. This is particularly the case for official powers not associated with the Royal Prerogative, which have been argued to comprise a "third source" of governmental authority. Looking at non-statutory powers directly, rather than incidentally, stirs up the intense but ultimately inconclusive debate about the conceptual basis of judicial review in English law. This provocative book argues that modern judges and scholars have neglected the very concepts necessary to understand the supervisory jurisdiction and that the law has become more complex than it needs to be. If we start from the concept of office and official action, rather than grand ideas about parliamentary sovereignty and the courts, the central questions answer themselves.
650 0 _aJudicial review of administrative acts
_zGreat Britain.
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_z9781316510667
830 0 _aCambridge studies in constitutional law.
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009039321
942 _2ddc
_cEB
999 _c9264
_d9264