000 02822nam a22004098i 4500
001 CR9781009025515
003 UkCbUP
005 20240920165814.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 201222s2022||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020 _a9781009025515 (ebook)
020 _z9781316516935 (hardback)
020 _z9781009016445 (paperback)
040 _aUkCbUP
_beng
_erda
_cUkCbUP
043 _aa-pk---
050 0 0 _aKPL3499
_b.K87 2022
082 0 0 _a347.5491/014
_223/eng/20220207
100 1 _aKureshi, Yasser,
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aSeeking supremacy :
_bthe pursuit of judicial power in Pakistan /
_cYasser Kureshi, University of Oxford.
264 1 _aCambridge :
_bCambridge University Press,
_c2022.
300 _a1 online resource (xii, 286 pages) :
_bdigital, PDF file(s).
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
490 1 _aCambridge studies in law and society
500 _aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 12 Sep 2022).
505 0 _aIntroduction -- Judiciary, rule of law and the military -- The Loyal Court (1947-1977) -- The Controlled Court (1977-1999: Part 1) -- Between the barracks and the bar (1977-1999: Part 2) -- The Confrontational Court (1999-2017) -- Epilogue : a judiciary fragmenting? -- Conclusion and comparative perspectives.
520 _aThe emergence of the judiciary as an assertive and confrontational center of power has been the most consequential new feature of Pakistan's political system. This book maps out the evolution of the relationship between the judiciary and military in Pakistan, explaining why Pakistan's high courts shifted from loyal deference to the military to open competition, and confrontation, with military and civilian institutions. Yasser Kureshi demonstrates that a shift in the audiences shaping judicial preferences explains the emergence of the judiciary as an assertive power center. As the judiciary gradually embraced less deferential institutional preferences, a shift in judicial preferences took place and the judiciary sought to play a more expansive and authoritative political role. Using this audience-based approach, Kureshi roots the judiciary in its political, social and institutional context, and develops a generalizable framework that can explain variation and change in judicial-military relations around the world.
650 0 _aPolitical questions and judicial power
_zPakistan
_xHistory.
650 0 _aJudges
_xPolitical activity
_zPakistan
_xHistory.
650 0 _aCivil-military relations
_zPakistan
_xHistory.
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_z9781316516935
830 0 _aCambridge studies in law and society.
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009025515
942 _2ddc
_cEB
999 _c9015
_d9015