000			02776nam a2200433 i 4500
001			CR9781108653329
003			UkCbUP
005			20240807103748.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr||||||||||||
008			181010s2021||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020			_a9781108653329 (ebook)
020			_z9781108498326 (hardback)
020			_z9781108735728 (paperback)
040			_aUkCbUP _beng _erda _cUkCbUP
041	1		_aeng _hger
043			_ae-gx---
050	0	0	_aKK2636 _b.P48 2021
082	0	0	_a346.4304/8 _223
100	1		_aPeukert, Alexander, _d1973- _eauthor.
240	1	0	_aKritik der Ontologie des Immaterialgüterrechts. _lEnglish
245	1	2	_aA critique of the ontology of intellectual property law / _cAlexander Peukert ; translated by Gill Mertens.
264		1	_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2021.
300			_a1 online resource (xi, 203 pages) : _bdigital, PDF file(s).
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aCambridge intellectual property and information law ; _v57
500			_aOriginally published in German as Kritik der Ontologie des Immaterialgüterrechts by Alexander Peukert.
500			_aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 03 May 2021).
505	0		_aIntroduction -- Two ontologies -- Two abstractions -- Interim summary : an implausible paradigm -- The legal explanatory power of the two ontologies -- Normative critique of the abstract IP object.
520			_aIntellectual property (IP) law operates with the ontological assumption that immaterial goods such as works, inventions, and designs exist, and that these abstract types can be owned like a piece of land. Alexander Peukert provides a comprehensive critique of this paradigm, showing that the abstract IP object is a speech-based construct, which first crystalised in the eighteenth century. He highlights the theoretical flaws of metaphysical object ontology and introduces John Searle's social ontology as a more plausible approach to the subject matter of IP. On this basis, he proposes an IP theory under which IP rights provide their holders with an exclusive privilege to use reproducible 'Master Artefacts.' Such a legal-realist IP theory, Peukert argues, is both descriptively and prescriptively superior to the prevailing paradigm of the abstract IP object. This work was originally published in German and was translated by Gill Mertens.
650		0	_aIntellectual property _zGermany.
700	1		_aMertens, Gill, _etranslator.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _z9781108498326
830		0	_aCambridge intellectual property and information law ; _v57.
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108653329
942			_2ddc _cEB
999			_c8981 _d8981