000			03664cam a2200625Mu 4500
001			9780429847370
003			FlBoTFG
005			20240213122830.0
006			m d
007			cr cnu---unuuu
008			181020s2018 xx o 000 0 eng d
040			_aOCoLC-P _beng _cOCoLC-P
020			_a9780429847370
020			_a0429847378
020			_a9780429847363
020			_a042984736X
020			_z1138317756
020			_z9781138317758
020			_a9780429847356
020			_a0429847351
020			_a9780429454981
020			_a0429454988
024	7		_a10.4324/9780429454981 _2doi
035			_a(OCoLC)1057671834 _z(OCoLC)1056195152 _z(OCoLC)1059045893
035			_a(OCoLC-P)1057671834
050		4	_aTK5105.875.I57 .N683 2019
082	0	4	_a384.33 _223
100	1		_aNovak, Alison N.
245	1	0	_aNetwork Neutrality and Digital Dialogic Communication _h[electronic resource] : _bHow Public, Private and Government Forces Shape Internet Policy.
260			_aMilton : _bRoutledge, _c2018.
300			_a1 online resource (149 p.).
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aRoutledge Studies in Media Law and Policy Ser.
500			_aDescription based upon print version of record.
505	0		_aCover; Half Title; Title Page; Copyright Page; Contents; List of figures; Acknowledgments; Introduction to Network Neutrality and Dialogic Communication; 1 Overview of Network Neutrality; 2 Political and Governmental Interpretations; 3 FCC and Regulatory Discourses; 4 Organizational and Industrial Interpretations; 5 Media Interpretations; 6 Public Involvement; 7 Global Reach; 8 Digital Dialogic Implications; Conclusion; Appendix: Methodological Approaches; Index
520	3		_aIn the months after the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) 2017 decision to repeal network neutrality as US policy, it is easy to forget the decades of public, organizational, media and governmental struggle to control digital policy and open access to the internet. Using dialogic communication tactics, the public, governmental actors and organizations impacted the ruling through YouTube comments, the FCC online system and social network communities. Network neutrality, which requires that all digital sites can be accessed with equal speed and ability, is an important example of how dialogic communication facilitates public engagement in policy debates. However, the practice and ability of the public, organizations and media to engage in dialogic communication are also greatly impacted by the FCC's decision. This book reflects on decades of global engagement in the network neutrality debate and the evolution of dialogic communication techniques used to shape one of the most relevant and critical digital policies in history.
588			_aOCLC-licensed vendor bibliographic record.
650		7	_aLAW / Media & the Law. _2bisacsh
650		7	_aCOMPUTERS / Internet / General. _2bisacsh
650		7	_acommunication studies. _2bisacsh
650		7	_adigital culture. _2bisacsh
650		7	_aFCC. _2bisacsh
650		7	_amedia history. _2bisacsh
650		7	_amedia law. _2bisacsh
650		7	_amedia policy. _2bisacsh
650		7	_amedia studies. _2bisacsh
650		7	_apublic policy. _2bisacsh
650		7	_atelecommunications. _2bisacsh
700	1		_aSebastian, Melinda.
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780429847370 _zClick here to view.
856	4	2	_3OCLC metadata license agreement _uhttp://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/forms/terms/vbrl-201703.pdf
938			_aTaylor & Francis _bTAFR _n9780429454981
999			_c5598 _d5598