000 06136cam a2200721 i 4500
001 9780429439100
003 FlBoTFG
005 20240213122829.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 181219t20192019enk ob 001 0 eng
040 _aOCoLC-P
_beng
_erda
_cOCoLC-P
020 _a9780429439100
_qelectronic book
020 _a0429439105
_qelectronic book
020 _a9780429798986
_qelectronic book
020 _a0429798989
_qelectronic book
020 _a9780429798993
_qelectronic book
020 _a0429798997
_qelectronic book
020 _a9780429798979
_qelectronic book
020 _a0429798970
_qelectronic book
020 _z9781138343481
_qhardcover
024 7 _a10.4324/9780429439100
_2doi
035 _a(OCoLC)1080247838
035 _a(OCoLC-P)1080247838
050 1 4 _aKJE6050
_b.L54 2019
072 7 _aLAW
_x018000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aLAW
_x075000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aLAW
_x000000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aLAW
_x032000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aLAW
_x051000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aLAQ
_2bicssc
082 0 0 _a342.2408/2
_223
100 1 _aLiguori, Anna,
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aMigration law and the externalization of border controls :
_bEuropean state responsibility /
_cAnna Liguori.
264 1 _aAbingdon, Oxon ;
_aNew York, NY :
_bRoutledge,
_c2019.
264 4 _c©2019
300 _a1 online resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
490 1 _aRoutledge research in EU law
520 _aOver the last few decades, both the European Union and European States have been implementing various strategies to externalize border controls with the declared intent of saving human lives and countering smuggling but with the actual end result of shifting borders, circumventing international obligations and ultimately preventing access to Europe. What has been principally deplored is the fact that externalizing border controls risks creating 'legal black holes'. Furthermore, what is particularly worrying in the current European debate is the intensification of this practice by multiple arrangements with unsafe third countries, exposing migrants and asylum seekers to serious human rights violations. This book explores whether European States can succeed in shifting their responsibility onto Third States in cases of human rights violations. Focusing, in particular, on the 2017 Italy-Libya Memorandum of Understanding, the book investigates the possible basis for triggering the responsibility of outsourcing States. The second part of the book examines how the Italy-Libya MoU is only a small part of a broader scenario, exploring EU policies of externalization. A brief overview of the recent decisions of the EU Court vis-aa-vis two aspects of externalization (the EU-Turkey statement and the issue of humanitarian visas) will pave the way for the conclusions since, in the author's view, the current attitude of the Luxembourg Court confirms the importance of focusing on the responsibility of European States and the urgent need to investigate the possibility of bringing a claim against the outsourcing States before the Court of Strasbourg. Offering a new perspective on an extremely topical subject, this book will appeal to students, scholars and practitioners with an interest in European Law, International Law, Migration and Human Rights.
505 0 _aCover; Half Title; Series Page; Title Page; Copyright Page; Contents; Preface; List of abbreviations; Introduction; PART I: A case study: the 2017 Italy-Libya Memorandum of Understanding; 1 The Italy-Libya Memorandum of Understanding of 2 February 2017; 2 Violations of human rights in Libya; 3 Italy's responsibility for complicity; 3.1 Article 16 of the International Law Commission Draft Articles on the Responsibility of States (ASR); 3.1.1 The mental element; 3.1.2 The requirement of opposability; 3.2 Italy's responsibility for complicity
505 8 _a4 Italy's responsibility for violation of positive obligations inherent in Article 3 ECHR4.1 Overlap between complicity and positive obligations; 4.2 Italy's responsibility for violation of positive obligations; 4.2.1 Jurisdiction under ECHR; 4.2.2 ECHR case law on positive obligations and jurisdiction; 5 Closing remarks; PART II: The 2017 Italy-Libya Memorandum of Understanding as a small part of a broader scenario; 1 The Externalization of EU migration policies; 1.1 The external dimension of EU migration and asylum policy in the GAMM and in the Agenda on Migration
505 8 _a1.2 The EU-Turkey statement of 18 March 20161.2.1 Criticism concerning human rights and refugee law; 1.2.2 Criticism concerning European Constitutional law; 1.3 From the European Commission communication of 7 June 2016 establishing a new Partnership Framework with third countries to the European Council conclusions of 28 June and 18 October 2018; 2 The attitude of the Luxembourg Court vis-à-vis externalization; 2.1 The case law concerning the EU-Turkey Statement; 2.2 The humanitarian visa judgment of 7 March 2017; 3 Closing remarks; Conclusions; Bibliography; Index
588 _aOCLC-licensed vendor bibliographic record.
650 0 _aEmigration and immigration law
_zEuropean Union countries.
650 0 _aImmigrants
_xCivil rights
_zEuropean Union countries.
650 0 _aImmigrants
_xCivil rights
_zItaly.
650 0 _aEmigration and immigration law
_zItaly.
650 0 _aEmigration and immigration law
_zLibya.
650 0 _aBorder security
_zEuropean Union countries.
650 0 _aBorder security
_zItaly.
651 0 _aItaly
_xForeign relations
_zLibya.
651 0 _aLibya
_xForeign relations
_zItaly.
650 7 _aLAW / Constitutional
_2bisacsh
650 7 _aLAW / Public
_2bisacsh
650 7 _aLAW / General
_2bisacsh
650 7 _aLAW / Emigration & Immigration
_2bisacsh
650 7 _aLAW / International
_2bisacsh
856 4 0 _3Taylor & Francis
_uhttps://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780429439100
856 4 2 _3OCLC metadata license agreement
_uhttp://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/forms/terms/vbrl-201703.pdf
999 _c5583
_d5583