000 04255cam a2200589 i 4500
001 9780429060243
003 FlBoTFG
005 20240213122829.0
006 m d u
007 cr |||||||||||
008 200805t20212021enk ob 001 0 eng
040 _aOCoLC-P
_beng
_erda
_cOCoLC-P
020 _a9780429060243
_qelectronic book
020 _a0429060246
_qelectronic book
020 _a9780429594403
_qelectronic book
020 _a0429594402
_qelectronic book
020 _a9780429595691
_qelectronic book
020 _a0429595697
_qelectronic book
020 _a9780429593116
_q(electronic bk. : Mobipocket)
020 _a0429593112
_q(electronic bk. : Mobipocket)
020 _z9780367182380
_qhardcover
035 _a(OCoLC)1184123245
035 _a(OCoLC-P)1184123245
050 0 4 _aKJE5607
_b.C45 2021
072 7 _aLAW
_x000000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aLAW
_x001000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aLAW
_x003000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aLAQ
_2bicssc
082 0 0 _a347.24/077
_223
100 1 _aChirulli, Paola,
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aNon-judicial remedies and EU administration :
_bprotection of rights versus preservation of autonomy /
_cPaola Chirulli and Luca de Lucia.
264 1 _aAbingdon, Oxon ;
_aNew York, NY :
_bRoutledge ;
_a[Turin, Italy] :
_bG. Giappichelli Editore,
_c2021.
264 4 _c©2021
300 _a1 online resource (xxiii, 271 pages).
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bn
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bnc
_2rdacarrier
490 1 _aRoutledge-Giappichelli studies in law
505 0 _aAdministrative remedies and the autonomy of EU administrations -- Internal review -- Appeals to the Commission against decisions of EU agencies -- Administrative review before the EU Agencies' Boards of Appeal -- Complaints to the European ombudsman -- Administrative remedies and personal data processing -- Administrative remedies : accountability, transformative tensions and the need for constitutionalisation.
520 _a"The increasing number of executive tasks assigned to EU institutions and agencies has resulted in an increase in the demand for justice that can no longer be satisfied by the courts alone. This has led to the development of a wide range of administrative remedies that have become a central part of the EU administrative justice system. This book examines the important theoretical and practical issues raised by this phenomenon. The work focuses on five administrative remedies: internal review; administrative review before the Commission of decisions of executive and decentralised agencies; administrative review before boards of appeal of decisions of decentralised agencies; and complaints before the EU Ombudsman and before the EU Data Protection Supervisor. The research rests on the idea that there is a complex, and at times ambivalent, relationship between administrative remedies and the varying degrees of autonomy of EU institutions and bodies, offices and agencies. The work draws on legislation and case law, as well as the internal rules of executive bodies, administrative practices and specific case law, data and statistics. This empirical approach helps to unveil the true dynamics present within these procedures and demonstrates that whilst administrative remedies may improve the relationship between individuals and the EU administration, their interplay with administrative autonomy might lead to a risk of fragmentation and incoherence in the EU administrative justice system"--
_cProvided by publisher.
588 _aOCLC-licensed vendor bibliographic record.
610 2 0 _aEuropean Ombudsman.
650 0 _aAdministrative remedies
_zEuropean Union countries.
650 0 _aJudicial review of administrative acts
_zEuropean Union countries.
650 0 _aAdministrative procedure
_zEuropean Union countries.
650 7 _aLAW / General
_2bisacsh
650 7 _aLAW / Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice
_2bisacsh
650 7 _aLAW / Alternative Dispute Resolution
_2bisacsh
700 1 _aDe Lucia, Luca,
_eauthor.
856 4 0 _3Taylor & Francis
_uhttps://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780429060243
856 4 2 _3OCLC metadata license agreement
_uhttp://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/forms/terms/vbrl-201703.pdf
999 _c5446
_d5446