000 | 03577cam a22006018i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 9781315283210 | ||
003 | FlBoTFG | ||
005 | 20240213122828.0 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr ||||||||||| | ||
008 | 181015s2019 nyu o 001 0 eng | ||
040 |
_aOCoLC-P _beng _erda _cOCoLC-P |
||
020 |
_a9781315283210 _q(ebk) |
||
020 | _a1315283212 | ||
020 |
_a9781315283197 _q(electronic bk.) |
||
020 |
_a1315283190 _q(electronic bk.) |
||
020 |
_a9781315283203 _q(electronic bk. : PDF) |
||
020 |
_a1315283204 _q(electronic bk. : PDF) |
||
020 |
_a9781315283180 _q(electronic bk. : Mobipocket) |
||
020 |
_a1315283182 _q(electronic bk. : Mobipocket) |
||
020 | _z9781138240599 (hbk) | ||
035 | _a(OCoLC)1057245556 | ||
035 | _a(OCoLC-P)1057245556 | ||
050 | 1 | 0 | _aK1443.C6 |
072 | 7 |
_aLAW _x001000 _2bisacsh |
|
072 | 7 |
_aLAW _x000000 _2bisacsh |
|
072 | 7 |
_aLAW _x050020 _2bisacsh |
|
072 | 7 |
_aLAW _x099000 _2bisacsh |
|
072 | 7 |
_aLNR _2bicssc |
|
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a346.048/6 _223 |
100 | 1 |
_aHughes, Anton, _c(Lawyer), _eauthor. |
|
245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe patentability of software : _bsoftware as mathematics / _cAnton Hughes. |
264 | 1 |
_aNew York, NY : _bRoutledge, _c2019. |
|
300 | _a1 online resource. | ||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bn _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bnc _2rdacarrier |
||
490 | 1 | _aRoutledge research in intellectual property | |
500 | _aIncludes index. | ||
505 | 0 | _aCover; Half Title; Series Page; Title; Copyright; Contents; Acknowledgements; Introduction; 1 The nature of software; 2 Why software patents are a problem; 3 The nature of mathematics; 4 Why mathematics is not patentable; 5 Why programming is not among the useful arts; 6 Implications; Conclusion; Index | |
520 | _aThis book explores the question of whether software should be patented. It analyses the ways in which the courts of the US, the EU, and Australia have attempted to deal with the problems surrounding the patentability of software and describes why it is that the software patent issue should be dealt with as a patentable subject matter issue, rather than as an issue of novelty or nonobviousness. Anton Hughes demonstrates that the current approach has failed and that a fresh approach to the software patent problem is needed. The book goes on to argue against the patentability of software based on its close relationship to mathematics. Drawing on historical and philosophical accounts of mathematics in pursuit of a better understanding of its nature and focusing the debate on the conditions necessary for mathematical advancement, the author puts forward an analytical framework centred around the concept of the useful arts. This analysis both explains mathematics', and therefore software's, nonpatentability and offers a theory of patentable subject matter consistent with Australian, American, and European patent law. | ||
588 | _aOCLC-licensed vendor bibliographic record. | ||
650 | 0 |
_aSoftware protection _xLaw and legislation. |
|
650 | 0 | _aPatent laws and legislation. | |
650 | 0 |
_aComputer software _xLaw and legislation. |
|
650 | 0 | _aMathematics. | |
650 | 7 |
_aLAW / Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice _2bisacsh |
|
650 | 7 |
_aLAW / General _2bisacsh |
|
650 | 7 |
_aLAW / Intellectual Property / Patent _2bisacsh |
|
650 | 7 |
_aLAW / Science & Technology _2bisacsh |
|
856 | 4 | 0 |
_3Taylor & Francis _uhttps://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315283210 |
856 | 4 | 2 |
_3OCLC metadata license agreement _uhttp://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/forms/terms/vbrl-201703.pdf |
999 |
_c5335 _d5335 |