000 02987nam a2200433Ia 4500
001 BP9798400618826BC
003 UkLoBP
005 20240403111049.0
006 m o d
007 cr cn|||||||||
008 230710s2023 enk o 001 0 eng
020 _a9798400618826
_q(online)
020 _z9781440878879 (alk. paper)
020 _z1440878870 (alk. paper)
020 _z9781440878886 (e-book)
020 _z1440878889 (e-book)
024 7 _a10.5040/9798400618826
_2doi
035 _a(OCoLC)1390968530
040 _aUkLoBP
_beng
_erda
_cUkLoBP
100 1 _aMauroni, Albert J.,
_eauthor.
245 0 0 _aBiocrisis :
_bDefining Biological Threats in U.S. Policy /
_cAlbert J. Mauroni.
250 _a1st ed.
264 1 _aWestport, CT :
_bPraeger,
_c2022.
264 2 _aNew York :
_bBloomsbury Publishing (US),
_c2023.
300 _a1 online resource (296 pages)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_2rdaft
_bHTML
490 1 _aPraeger Security International
505 0 _aIllustrations Acronyms Preface 1. Anatomy of a Crisis 2. The Problem Is Political 3. U.S. Health Care Is a Huge Creature 4. National Security Concerns about Biological Threats 5. Building a Strategy for Disease Prevention 6. Bioterrorism Was Always Misunderstood 7. Biodefense: Underappreciated and Largely Ignored 8. Biosurety-the Public's Biggest Fear? 9. Making the Term "Biosecurity" Relevant Again 10. Creating a New Norm Notes Glossary Index
520 _aThis book examines the recent intersection of national security and public health regarding biological threats to the U.S. populace and proposes improvements to the executive and legislative development of U.S. policy addressing biological threat mitigation. Over the last 20 years, the national security community has engaged with disease-related issues that have traditionally been the scope of public health agencies. The federal government's response has been to create a single national biodefense strategy, which has been largely ineffective in improving conditions due to poor terminology, a lack of leadership, and a failure to assess government programs. Applying a public policy framework, Albert J. Mauroni examines how the government addresses biological threats-including disease prevention, bioterrorism response, military biodefense, biosurety, and agricultural biosecurity and food safety. He proposes a new approach to countering biological threats, arguing that lead agencies should focus on implementing discrete portfolios with annual assessments against clear and achievable objectives.
650 7 _aCentral government policies
650 0 _aBiosecurity
_zUnited States.
700 1 _aMauroni, Albert J.,
_d1962-
_eauthor.
830 0 _aPraeger Security International.
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.5040/9798400618826?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections
942 _2ddc
_cEB
_n0
999 _c11059
_d11059