000			04087nam a2200517 i 4500
001			9781509946907
003			CaBNVSL
005			20240327104912.0
006			m o d
007			cr cn||||m|||a
008			220105s2022 enk ob 101 0 eng d
020			_a9781509946907 _q(online)
020			_a9781509946884 _q(ePub)
020			_z9781509946914 _q(softback)
020			_z9781509946877 _q(hardback)
024	7		_a10.5040/9781509946907 _2doi
035			_a(OCoLC)1291220710
040			_aCaBNVSL _beng _erda _cCaBNVSL _dCaBNVSL
043			_ae------
050		4	_aLCC _b.S63 2022eb
082	0	4	_aDDC _223
100	1		_aSonnleitner, Lisa, _eauthor.
245	1	2	_aA constitutionalist approach to the European Convention on Human Rights : _bthe legitimacy of evolutive and static interpretation / _cLisa Sonnleitner.
250			_aFirst edition.
264		1	_aLondon [England] : _bHart Publishing, _c2022
264		2	_a[London, England] : _bBloomsbury Publishing, _c2022
300			_a1 online resource (272 pages).
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aHart Studies in Constitutional Theory.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_aIntroduction Part I: Fundamentals -- 1. On the Concepts of Law and Human Rights -- 2. A New Concept of Evolutive and Static Interpretation -- 3. The Legitimacy of Evolutive Interpretation Revisited -- 4. The Criticism Against Evolutive Interpretation Revisited Part II: The ECHR Constitution -- 5. The Argument of Constitutionalism -- 6. The Constitutional Nature of the ECHR -- 7. Three Basic Constitutional Principles of the ECHR Part III: Balanced Legitimacy Model -- 8. Setting the Scene for Balancing at the Interpretation Stage -- 9. The Balancing Model for Evolutive and Static Interpretation -- 10. External Justification Part IV: The Balanced Legitimacy Model Applied -- 11. The Right to Divorce -- 12. The Right to Assisted Suicide -- 13. The Right to Preservation of the Environment Conclusion -- Bibliography -- Index
506			_aAbstract freely available; full-text restricted to individual document purchasers.
520			_a"This book presents a new constitutional argument for the legitimacy of evolutive interpretation of the ECHR. It constructs a model, in which evolutive and static constitutional principles are balanced with each other. The author argues that there are three possible interpretive approaches in time-sensitive interpretations of the ECHR, but that only one of them is justifiable by reference to the constitutional principles of the ECHR in every single case. The ECHR's constitutional principles either require an evolutive or static interpretation or they do not establish a preference relation at all, which leads to a margin of appreciation of the member states in the interpretation of the Convention. The balancing model requires the determination of the weights of the competing evolutive and static constitutional principles. For this purpose, the author defines weighting factors for determining the importance of evolutive or static interpretation in a concrete case."-- _cProvided by publisher.
532	0		_aCompliant with Level AA of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. Content is displayed as HTML full text which can easily be resized or read with assistive technology, with mark-up that allows screen readers and keyboard-only users to navigate easily.
538			_aMode of access: World Wide Web.
630	0	0	_aConvention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms _d(1950 November 5)
630	0	0	_aConvention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
650		0	_aHuman rights _zEurope.
655		4	_aElectronic books.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _z9781509946914
830		0	_aHart Studies in Constitutional Theory
856	4	0	_3Abstract with links to full text _uhttps://doi.org/10.5040/9781509946907?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections _qtext/html
975			_aHart Publishing 2022
999			_c10796 _d10796