000			03783nam a2200577 i 4500
001			9781509932313
003			CaBNVSL
005			20240318183856.0
006			m o d
007			cr cn|||||||||
008			200710s2020 enk ob 101 0 eng d
010			_z 2020009170 (print)
019			_a1143472564
020			_a9781509932313 _q(ebook)
020			_z9781509932306 _q(PDF)
020			_z9781509932283 _q(hardback)
020			_z1509932283 _q(print)
020			_z9781509932290 _q(epub)
035			_a(OCoLC)1143791689
035			_a(CaBNVSL)mat09932313
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cCaBNVSL _dCaBNVSL
050		4	_aKZ6250 _b.F34 2020eb
082	0	0	_a341.5/5 _223
100	1		_aFahner, Johannes Hendrik, _d1988- _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aJudicial deference in international adjudication : _ba comparative analysis / _cJohannes Hendrik Fahner.
264		1	_aOxford [England] : _bHart, _c2020.
264		2	_a[London, England] : _bBloomsbury Publishing, _c2020
300			_a1 online resource (208 pages).
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aStudies in International Law
500			_aBased on author's thesis (doctoral - Universiteit van Amsterdam, 2018) issued under title: Intensity of review in international courts and tribunals : a comparative analysis of deference.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_aIntroduction -- Judicial Deference in International Practice -- A Comparative Analysis of Deference in International Practice -- A Normative Assessment of Deference in International Adjudication -- Final Conclusions.
506			_aAbstract freely available; full-text restricted to individual document purchasers.
520			_a"International adjudicators are more and more often requested to pass judgement on matters that are traditionally considered to fall within the domestic jurisdiction of States. Especially in the fields of human rights, trade, and investment law, international tribunals are now commonly required to evaluate decisions of national authorities that have been made in the due course of democratic procedures and public deliberation. This raises the question of whether international adjudicators should review such decisions de novo or whether they should give deference to domestic authorities. In many national legal orders, courts do not exercise de novo review with regard to legislative and administrative decisions, as this would allow them to supplant the powers of other branches of government. Instead, courts exercise only deferential forms of review, limiting the intensity of their review by giving special weight to the determinations made by the institution under review. This book investigates whether international courts and tribunals have also adopted deferential standards of review and whether they should do so"-- _cProvided by publisher.
530			_aAlso published in print.
532	0		_aCompliant with Level AA of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. Content is displayed as HTML full text which can easily be resized or read with assistive technology, with mark-up that allows screen readers and keyboard-only users to navigate easily
538			_aMode of access: World Wide Web.
650		0	_aInternational courts.
650		0	_aJudicial process.
650		0	_aDeference (Law)
650		7	_aLaw _2bicssc
655		0	_aElectronic books.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _z9781509932283
830		0	_aStudies in international law (Stockholm, Sweden)
856	4	0	_3Abstract with links to full text _uhttps://doi.org/10.5040/9781509932313?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections
975			_aHart Publishing 2020
999			_c10637 _d10637