000			05708nam a2200649 i 4500
001			9781509930364
003			CaBNVSL
005			20240318131058.0
006			m o d
007			cr cn|||||||||
008			201221s2020 enk ob 101 0 eng d
010			_z 2020048490 (print)
019			_a1178636008
020			_a9781509930364 _q(ebook)
020			_z9781509930357 _q(PDF)
020			_z9781509944774 _q(print)
020			_z9781509930333 _q(hardback)
020			_z1509930337 _q(print)
020			_z150994477X _q(print)
020			_z9781509930340 _q(ePub)
024	7		_a10.5040/9781509930364 _2doi
035			_a(OCoLC)1238133335
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cCaBNVSL _dCaBNVSL
043			_ae-uk---
050		4	_aKD4902 _b.E94 2021eb
082	0	0	_a347.41/012 _223
245	0	0	_aExecutive decision-making and the courts : _brevisiting the origins of modern judicial review / _cedited by T.T. Arvind, Richard Kirkham, Daithí Mac Síthigh, and Lindsay Stirton.
250			_aFirst edition.
264		1	_aGorodnsville : _bHart Publishing, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing, _c2020.
264		2	_a[London, England] : _bBloomsbury Publishing, _c2020
300			_a1 online resource (576 pages).
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _2rdacarrier
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_aIntroduction : judicial review and the quartet / T.T. Arvind, Richard Kirkham, Daithí Mac Síthigh and Lindsay Stirton -- Lord Reid : the judge as law maker? / Robert Reed, Lord Reed of Allermuir -- Ridge v Baldwin : executive and judicial approaches to administrative law before and during the quartet years / Robert Thomas -- Judges and parliamentary democracy : the lessons of Padfield v Ministry of Agriculture, fisheries, and food / Maurice Sunkin -- Legitimacy and the courts : the forgotten story of Conway v Rimmer / T.T. Arvind and Lindsay Stirton -- Anisminic in retrospect / David Feldman -- Plus ça change? an empirical analysis of judicial review in modern administrative law / Sarah Nason -- The reawakening of common law rights : are they still 'suitable for the winning of freedom in the new age'? / Paul Bowen QC -- Beyond the end of ouster clause history? / Joe Tomlinson -- Administrative law and the administrative court for-or in-Wales / David C Gardner -- The rule of law against judicial review? the quartet in Scots administrative law / Paul F Scott -- The quartet plus Two : judicial review in Northern Ireland / Gordon Anthony -- Israeli administrative law and the quartet-one step ahead / Daphne Barak-Erez -- Importation and indigeneity : the quartet in New Zealand administrative law / Dean R. Knight -- The quarter in the new Commonwealth / Peter Cane -- The quartet cases compared / Stephen Bailey -- 'Judicial power' and political power : reflections in light of the quartet / Alexander Latham-Gambirefl -- Strategic judging : lessons from the Reid era of judicial decision-making / Richard Kirkham and Dimitrios Tsarapatsanis -- The real argument about judicial review / T.T. Arvind, Richard Kirkham, Daithí Mac Síthigh and Lindsay Stirton.
506			_aAbstract freely available; full-text restricted to individual document purchasers.
520			_a"In this book leading experts from across the common law world assess the impact of three seminal House of Lords' judgments; Padfield v Minister of Agriculture; Conway v Rimmer; and Anisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission, all of which were decided in 1968. Together with Ridge v Baldwin decided five years earlier, this 'Quartet' has been widely taken to have marked a turning point in the development of court-centred administrative law, leading directly to the emergence of modern judicial review. These cases are examined in order to interrogate not only the courts' role in the protection of individual rights and interests against executive over-reach, but also the broader question of the contribution the judiciary can make to developing and maintaining good government in the United Kingdom. By doing so, the book sheds new light on both the complex processes through which the modern system of judicial review emerged, and the normative and constitutional choices that are implicit in its jurisprudence. It further reflects upon the choices made and their implications for how the achievements, failings, and limitations of the common law in reviewing actions of the executive can be evaluated"-- _cProvided by publisher.
530			_aAlso published in print.
532	0		_aCompliant with Level AA of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. Content is displayed as HTML full text which can easily be resized or read with assistive technology, with mark-up that allows screen readers and keyboard-only users to navigate easily
538			_aMode of access: World Wide Web.
650		0	_aJudicial review _zGreat Britain.
650		0	_aJudicial review of administrative acts _zGreat Britain.
650		0	_aAdministrative courts _zGreat Britain.
650		0	_aAdministrative law _zGreat Britain.
650		0	_aExecutive power _zGreat Britain.
650		7	_aConstitutional & administrative law _2bicssc
655		0	_aElectronic books.
700	1		_aArvind, T. T. _q(Thiruvallore Thattai), _eeditor.
700	1		_aKirkham, Richard, _eeditor.
700	1		_aMac Síthigh, Daithí, _eeditor.
700	1		_aStirton, Lindsay, _eeditor.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _z9781509944774
856	4	0	_3Abstract with links to full text _uhttps://doi.org/10.5040/9781509930364?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections
975			_aHart Publishing 2021
999			_c10606 _d10606