000			04192nam a22004931i 4500
001			bpp09261931
003			UtOrBLW
005			20240312110528.0
006			m d
007			cr un ---uuuua
008			180619s2017 enk ob 001 0 eng d
020			_a9781509904693
020			_z9781509904662 (hardback)
020			_z9781509904679 (electronic book)
020			_z9781509904686 (PDF)
024	7		_a10.5040/9781509904693 _2doi
035			_a(OCoLC)984899067
040			_aUtOrBLW _beng _cUtOrBLW _dUkLoBP _erda _epn
041			_aeng
043			_ae-uk---
050	0	0	_aKD1269 _b.L365 2017
082	0	0	_a346.4104/8 _223
245	0	0	_aLandmark cases in intellectual property law / _cedited by Jose Bellido.
264		1	_aOxford ; _aPortland, Oregon : _bHart Publishing, _c2017.
300			_a1 online resource (xxvii, 381 pages).
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
490	0		_aLandmark cases series
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_aMansell v Bunger (1626) -- Sean Bottomley -- Stationers v Seymour (1677) -- H. Tomás Gómez-Arostegui -- Sayer v Moore (1785) -- Isabella Alexander -- Day v Day, Day and Martin (1816) -- Lionel Bently -- Nobel's Explosives Company, Limited, v Anderson (1894) -- Seymour Mauskopf -- Walter v Lane (1900) -- Barbara Lauriat -- Spalding v Gamage (1915) -- Hazel Carty -- King Features Syndicate, Inc and Betts v O & M Kleeman Ltd (1940) -- Jose Bellido -- Slee & Harris's Application (1966) -- Brad Sherman -- Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd (1969) -- Tanya Aplin -- Biogen v Medeva (1996) -- Luke McDonagh -- R v Johnstone (2003) -- Elena Cooper -- Lego Juris A -- S v OHIM (2010) -- Alain Pottage.
520	8		_aThis volume explores the nature of intellectual property law by looking at particular disputes. All the cases gathered here aim to show the versatile and unstable character of a discipline still searching for landmarks. Each contribution offers an opportunity to raise questions about the narratives that have shaped the discipline throughout its short but profound history. The volume begins by revisiting patent litigation to consider the impact of the Statute of Monopolies (1624). It continues looking at different controversies to describe how the existence of an author's right in literary property was a plausible basis for legal argument, even though no statute expressly mentioned authors' rights before the Statute of Anne (1710). The collection also explores different moments of historical significance for intellectual property law: the first trade mark injunctions; the difficulties the law faced when protecting maps; and the origins of originality in copyright law. Similarly, it considers the different ways of interpreting patent claims in the late nineteenth and twentieth century; the impact of seminal cases on passing off and the law of confidentiality; and more generally, the construction of intellectual property law and its branches in their interaction with new technologies and marketing developments. It is essential reading for anyone interested in the development of intellectual property law
530			_aAlso issued in print.
532	1		_aCompliant with Level AA of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. Content is displayed as HTML full text which can easily be resized or read with assistive technology, with mark-up that allows screen readers and keyboard-only users to navigate easily
533			_aElectronic reproduction. _bLondon : _cBloomsbury Publishing, _d2018 _nAvailable via World Wide Web. _nAccess limited by licensing agreement.
650		0	_aIntellectual property _zGreat Britain _vCases.
650		7	_2Intellectual property law
700	1		_aBellido, Jose, _eeditor.
776	0		_aOriginal _w(DLC) 2017017562
776	0	8	_iOnline version: _tLandmark cases in intellectual property law _dPortland, Oregon : Hart Publishing, 2017 _z9781509904679 _w(DLC) 2017020683
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.5040/9781509904693?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections
975			_aHart Publishing 2017
999			_c10484 _d10484