NLU Meghalaya Library

Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC)

Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

The long process of development : building markets and states in pre-industrial England, Spain, and their colonies / Jerry Hough, Duke University, Robin Grier, University of Oklahoma.

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextPublisher: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2015Description: 1 online resource (x, 448 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9781107479838 (ebook)
Subject(s): Additional physical formats: Print version: : No titleDDC classification:
  • 338.9 23
LOC classification:
  • JC131 .H68 2015
Online resources:
Contents:
The collective-action difficulties of creating an effective state -- The pre-state of England and Spain: the importance of man-made geography -- The early state in England and Spain -- The minimally effective state: England, tax revenue, and colonization -- Spanish colonial policy and the transition to the minimally effective state -- A dominant coalition in transition: England and the rise of the merchant -- navy alliance after 1600 -- The English colonies -- Colonial Mexico -- The collective-action problems of the formation of the United States -- The collective-action problems of the formation of Mexico -- The implications for development theory.
Summary: Douglass North once emphasized that development takes centuries, but he did not have a theory of how and why change occurs. This groundbreaking book advances such a theory by examining in detail why England and Spain developed so slowly from 1000 to 1800. A colonial legacy must go back centuries before settlement, and this book points to key events in England and Spain in the 1260s to explain why Mexico lagged behind the United States economically in the twentieth century. Based on the integration of North's institutional approach with Mancur Olson's collective action theory, Max Weber's theory of value change, and North's focus on dominant coalitions based on rent and military in In the Shadow of Violence, this theory of change leads to exciting new historical interpretations, including the crucial role of the merchant-navy alliance in England and the key role of George Washington's control of the military in 1787.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).

The collective-action difficulties of creating an effective state -- The pre-state of England and Spain: the importance of man-made geography -- The early state in England and Spain -- The minimally effective state: England, tax revenue, and colonization -- Spanish colonial policy and the transition to the minimally effective state -- A dominant coalition in transition: England and the rise of the merchant -- navy alliance after 1600 -- The English colonies -- Colonial Mexico -- The collective-action problems of the formation of the United States -- The collective-action problems of the formation of Mexico -- The implications for development theory.

Douglass North once emphasized that development takes centuries, but he did not have a theory of how and why change occurs. This groundbreaking book advances such a theory by examining in detail why England and Spain developed so slowly from 1000 to 1800. A colonial legacy must go back centuries before settlement, and this book points to key events in England and Spain in the 1260s to explain why Mexico lagged behind the United States economically in the twentieth century. Based on the integration of North's institutional approach with Mancur Olson's collective action theory, Max Weber's theory of value change, and North's focus on dominant coalitions based on rent and military in In the Shadow of Violence, this theory of change leads to exciting new historical interpretations, including the crucial role of the merchant-navy alliance in England and the key role of George Washington's control of the military in 1787.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.